Everybody jokes about “TMI” these days:

But the implications for our democracy are troubling. To achieve their goals, political movements need to reach and influence tens of millions of citizens. Despite conventional thinking that the Internet helps spread information, such reach is actually impossible online.

Consider: In August 2007, there were about 100 million blogs. Of those that reached 100,000 people or more in a month, only about 20 focused on news or politics, according to ComScore Media Metrix, a company that measures Internet traffic. The most popular was Breitbart.com, with only 1.1 million unique visitors, or 0.4 percent of the 228 million U.S. adults 18 and older.

Moreover, visitors to blogs and Web sites probably don’t see most of the information on them. According to Nielsen Online, the average visitor to newspaper Web sites stops by for just 1.5 minutes per day on average. By contrast, the average print newspaper reader spends 40 minutes with each day’s edition…

the larger problem: The overload siphons audiences and revenue from newspapers such as The Post and other outlets that can spread important information, forcing these media to shrink and to rely increasingly on advertising to stay afloat. These trends predate the Internet era, but they’ve gotten worse.

And that there’s your real problem iddn’t it, Binky?  Your job security.

The opportunity to educate millions of citizens, so essential to significant movements of the past, has dwindled. In the early New Deal era, the Roman Catholic “radio priest” Father Charles Coughlin [the stone Socialist] promoted ideas for economic reform to a weekly audience estimated at 40 million, which helped pressure President Franklin D. Roosevelt to enact Social Security, the Works Progress Administration and other programs. Today’s top talk-radio host, Rush Limbaugh, reaches only about 14 million people per week.

Without broad media coverage, the civil rights movement might never have succeeded. In 1965, front-page newspaper coverage of the bloody march from Selma to Montgomery, Ala., helped push Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act, [despite the objections of the *Democratic* Party]…

[Paraphrased verbosity: Newspaper readership sales down from one paper for every two adults to one paper for every 4.5 adults… TV Nooz viewership down from 32 percent of the adult population to 12 percent of the adult population]

...The challenge is to find ways to strengthen democracy in the era of TMI. It won’t be easy, but the situation may not be irreversible, either.

Oh!  I see.  You’re trying to strengthen democracy, here, eh?  So what’s your proposal to make us all more Free?

Rather than call for government regulation of technology itself, perhaps the best way to limit the avalanche is to make the technologies that overproduce information more expensive and less widespread. It could be done via a progressive energy tax designed to keep energy prices at a consistently high level (while providing assistance to lower- and middle-income Americans).

... If Americans are finally giving up SUVs because of high oil prices [*if*??!!  nice “argument,” Pal.  Epic Debate Society Fail], might we not eventually do the same with some information technologies that only seem to fragment our society, not unite it?  [on his planet, Unite = Soylent Green whaaa?  it’s greeeen, iddn’t it?!] A reduced supply of information technology might at least gradually cause us to gravitate toward community-centered media such as local newspapers instead of the hyper-individualistic outlets we have now.
[Sitting in my 800sf high-rise in a walkable comuuuunity, listening to the Smart Train rumble by and digesting “community-centered media"… Kill me.  Kill me now.]

According to a site I found in on teh InnerToobs in 0.13 seconds, an average laptop uses about 105 watts 15-45 watts [as corrected by the author of the post *blushes*]—a regular dim bulb.  A super-dooper high-end gaming desktop with a CRT monitor [why?] would use 330 watts.  So running a laptop about 20 hours a week @ 10¢/kWh would cost a whopping $11 $3.12 a year.  Just how dam expensive does this douche want to make electricity to wipe us hyper-individualistic outlets off his planet and return his job security?

Change will no doubt be difficult [that’s not what Uh-bama said!], and it won’t happen overnight [that’s not what Uh-bama saaaid!]. But it’s time for some creative solutions for digging our democracy out of the information avalanche that threatens to smother it. [yeah.  It’s definitely too much Liberty that’s doing the “smothering.”]

‘Course if I had thought processes as stunted, twisted and freakishly atrophied as his, I’d be worried, too.

I goofed.  A laptop, according to Michael Bluejay of Saving Electricity uses 15-45 watts. [Please see his site for other useful information]

So, using the formula, [Watts X Hours Used / 1000] X Cost per kWh = Cost, I’ll use a mid range 30 watts X 20 hours/wk or 1,040/yr [31,200] /1000 [31.2] X cost of 10¢ per kWh to arrive at a whopping $3.12 a year to run an average laptop.

Claire, Ideologically Stubborn Heatist Ruralite Claire, Ideologically Stubborn Heatist Ruralite
08/27 at 08:12 PM •
(17) Say it, don't spray it...*link*
Page 1 of 1 pages

~stalk me~

^ thanQ raz0r! ^

  Subscribe to this site.

My Amazon.com Wish List


If you register for membership and I don't approve you, send me an e-mail so I know you're for real.

Sgt. Christopher "Ski" Rudzinski
August 29,1981-October 16, 2009

Dr. Liviu Librescu
August 18, 1930 to April 16, 2007

Ezra Levant
Because it's my bloody right to do so!

Soldiers Angels

Thong Media
Don't get your panties in a wad™

~ ‘Salvador Dali’ Award ~

Most Creative Blogging

The 2008 Weblog Awards

Latest posts...

SondraKisP *at* Gmail.com

E-MAIL Claire:
Claire *at* e-biscuit *dot* com visit e-Claire !!!

e-mail The Ugly American: tua_sondrak*AT*yahoo.com

e-mail DougM: dougmkisp*at*nc.rr.com

Agent Bedhead
Alyssa A. Lappen
Andrea Harris
Babalu Blog
Baby TrollBlog
Beautiful Atrocities
Caption This
Cold Fury
Conservative Dialysis
Country Store
Cowboy Blob
Curmudgeonly and Skeptical
Daily Caller
Dangerous Logic
Dennis the Peasant
Desert Cat's Paradise
Digital Hairshirt
Diversity Lane
e-mails from an asshole
Eternity Road
Five Feet of Fury (Kathy Shaidle)
Four Right Wing Wackos
Gay Patriot
Geezer's Corner
Ghost of a Flea
Girl On The Right
Glenn Beck
Grouchy Old Cripple
Hillbilly White Trash
Hog Whitman
Hope n' Change
Hot Air
Howling at the Moon
Into the Metalkort
Irons In The Fire
Justin Buist
Laurie Kendrick
Life With Monkeys
Like News But Tasty

Llama Butchers Long War Journal mASS Backwards Michael Yon Misha Mo FiZiX Gr4FiX Moonbattery Mostly Cajun Moxie My Shrapnel Neptunus Lex NewsBiscuit
NewsMax On the Other Foot Oraculations Orthometer (Fr. Erik) Pat Dollard Phat Phree Post Secret Powerline Pull On Superman's Cape Random Nuclear Strikes Ravenwood's Universe Resistance is Futile! Riehl World View Right Wing News Rivrdog Rush Limbaugh Sad Old Goth Say Anything (Anna) Scribal Terror Shakey Pete's Shootin' Shack Small Dead Animals Staghounds StixBlog Student Nurse Cracker Take Five
Tammy Bruce
The Astute Blogger The Brutality of Reason (Ironcross) The Jawa Report The Mudville Gazette The Nose on Your Face The Onion
The People's Cube
Theodore's World (Wild Thing)
Tools of Renewal

Current Assignments
Complete Archives

All Blog related e-mails and comments are subject to being published, praised or ridiculed. By submitting e-mails and comments to this site you agree to the above policy. Sondrak.com
© 2005-2011

The opinions expressed here represent only their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the other contributors to this website.

All Rights Reserved
© 2005-2011

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you feel that any of the images used on this site infringe on YOUR rights, please contact me via the e-mail posted on this page and I will be more than happy to comply with your request and remove them. All original photos and montages posted on this site are owned by me and marked to distinguish. They may not be used for any purpose without specific permission by me. PARTICULARLY the "Soni head" trademark. You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this website, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this website also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.